Every number in the system comes from the formulas on this page; no one's opinion is weighted in · all values are read from what the system is actually using as this page loads
เกณฑ์ราคา = ปันผลต่อหุ้นต่อปี ÷ 5%
is the price at which the pre-tax dividend yield lands exactly on the 5% target. A market price below this line earns the “meets band” tag, which meansonly where the price is below the line you set It does not mean the company is good or worth buying
Computed purely from that stock's own annual dividend history, with nothing to do with its share price. It measures two things together: How steadily it pays and whether the dividend keeps up with inflation then multiplied by a risk discount based on the payout ratio
| Components | Weight | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Paid every year | 35% | how many of the years examined actually had a payment |
| Rarely cuts the dividend * | 25% | the number of falls from the previous year |
| When it cuts, it cuts shallowly * | 25% | how deep the worst cut was, in % |
| Real dividend growth after inflation | 15% | Dividend growth rate Delete inflation over the same period |
* These two are weighted by the evidence actually available — a stock that has only paid for a few years has “never cut” automatically, simply for lack of history in which to cut. Awarding full marks would hand free points to something unproven, so the system counts it asthe number of chances it had to cut (consecutive year pairs where the earlier year actually paid), then pulls these two scorestoward the middlein proportion to what is still short · pulled toward the middle from both directions a stock with a short record that has cut before is pulledand upalike, because thin evidence should not decide good from bad
Why inflation has to be in this — the score used to measure steadiness alone, so a stock paying the same amount every year scored highly even thoughthat money buys less every year A real case from the system: a stock paying the same ฿0.60 for nine years running used to score 70, even though the purchasing power of that dividend fell 11.5% over the period
The “real growth” figure appears as a small line under the score in every table with a quality column — green means the dividend buys more each year, red means purchasing power is falling even though the dividend itself has not been cut
MeasuresHow steadily dividends come in It does not measure share-price volatility. Every part is weighted by the value actually held
| Topic | out of | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Capital spread | 25 | how many stocks the money is effectively spread across, and how much the largest one takes |
| Spread of dividend sources | 25 | how many stocks the dividend effectively comes from, and how far it is concentrated in a few |
| Dividend quality | 30 | the average quality score (item 3), weighted by the value held |
| Spread across sectors | 20 | how much the largest sector takes, and how many sectors it is effectively spread across |
These thresholds were not picked out of the air — backtested over the real dividend history of 22 stocks across 2560–2568, sampling 6,000 portfolios, which showed higher-scoring portfolios clearly less likely to suffer a steep fall in income (the full table for each score band is shown to signed-in users)
Prices and dividend history come from several market data providers checked against each other · portfolio data and order fills come from the user's own broker through the Settrade Open API · the actual withholding rate comes from statements the user imports themselves
The stocks on the “Reference portfolio” page are a starting set for comparison only; users can add their own stocks and set their own targets throughout